I agree that it is a serious problem. Couple that with the size of the deficit, and we will not be able to help the truly needy.
dag hammarsjkold wrote:Tulsi Gabbard voted neither yea or nay on today's impeachment.
I swear this gal is the real deal. She is very clever.
I believe that she chose to follow her conscience on today's vote, but by not choosing either yea or nay she effectively grabbed more media attention that she is desperate for if she is to continue on her path.
As soon as I learned what she did I went straight to her website and donated $75 more dollars to her campaign. I can only hope I wasn't alone.
I just wish some billionaire or millionaire would support her campaign on principal.
I'm telling anyone who will listen, give this woman a chance and hear her out. She ain't half bad.
dh
freeman3 wrote:I don't think we agree on that point, Brad...
Yeah, Gabbard's position makes no sense. If you think that Trump committed wrongdoing...then he should be impeached. Then it is not a partisan process. And if it is partisan...then he did not do so something impeachable. Put them together...and you have nonsense.
I don't want people who are not truly needing assistance on Medicaid getting it regardless of malady? Do you? I don't think so. Maybe I am wrong, but I hope I am not. If the person does not truly need assistance, then they shouldn't be on it!
Why are you wanting my health care to be controlled by someone I do not approve of when I am the one paying for it?
How can you rationalize that someone can be making their own health care decisions when they are not paying for it, in the case of abortion?
bbauska wrote:Maybe you are allowed to CHOOSE if you want to be part of that program. Tell me if that is an option for a Canadian citizen to refuse payment for and participation the Provincial Health program