bbauska
I do.
And they were being armed... Just not directly, since American law precluded such. (France, Britain Germany and Canada have also been sending arms directly to the Kurds.)
What Flynn vetoed was directly arming them...
I don't know how the current policy is affected by US law.... Perhaps because Trump is Republican Congress is willing to ignore the law?
The point I was making is that the notion that somehow the US was not arming the Kurds is not supported by fact. (Only "directly arming")
I also think its important to understand how corrupt Trumps administration is that his NSA, a paid lobbyist for Turkey, vetoed the policy of directly arming the Kurds.
I understand from a source close to him that Mike Flynn "Is a real good guy".
Do you think the Kurds should, or should not be armed?
I do.
And they were being armed... Just not directly, since American law precluded such. (France, Britain Germany and Canada have also been sending arms directly to the Kurds.)
What Flynn vetoed was directly arming them...
I don't know how the current policy is affected by US law.... Perhaps because Trump is Republican Congress is willing to ignore the law?
The point I was making is that the notion that somehow the US was not arming the Kurds is not supported by fact. (Only "directly arming")
I also think its important to understand how corrupt Trumps administration is that his NSA, a paid lobbyist for Turkey, vetoed the policy of directly arming the Kurds.
I understand from a source close to him that Mike Flynn "Is a real good guy".