fate
I gave you a complete logical answer to your question. Even though your question was something of a contradiction.
Your question was ...
Fate
From the National Commission on Forensic Science
https://www.justice.gov/ncfs/file/641331/download
Certainty is perfect knowledge that has total security from error, or the mental state of being without doubt. Objectively defined, certainty is total continuity and validity of all foundational inquiry, to the highest degree of precision. Something is certain only if no skepticism can occur.
My answer explained the science of the medicine and explained why
rickyp
That is a complete answer.
I can't help it if your grounding in science is incomplete to the extent you can emply the phrase "scientific certainty like it means something."
Your argument for courts allowing the parents and the for profit doctor the freedom to conduct a cruel expensive medical experiment on the baby is "There's always a chance".
I offered you the medical science that shows there isn't....
2. He demonstrably argued "not y" was the same as "y." That is an epic logical fallacy.
I gave you a complete logical answer to your question. Even though your question was something of a contradiction.
Your question was ...
Fate
Is "unlikely" a scientific certainty?
Hint: that is a "yes" or "no" question.
From the National Commission on Forensic Science
.Additionally, the legal community should recognize that
medical professionals and other scientists do not routinely use “to a reasonable scientific certainty” when expressing conclusions outside of the courts since there is no foundational scientific basis for its use
https://www.justice.gov/ncfs/file/641331/download
Certainty is perfect knowledge that has total security from error, or the mental state of being without doubt. Objectively defined, certainty is total continuity and validity of all foundational inquiry, to the highest degree of precision. Something is certain only if no skepticism can occur.
My answer explained the science of the medicine and explained why
rickyp
There would be some benefit to medical science by inflicting more suffering on the baby. But there is no hope, whatsoever, that this treatment will have a genuinely positive affect on the baby.
That is a complete answer.
I can't help it if your grounding in science is incomplete to the extent you can emply the phrase "scientific certainty like it means something."
Your argument for courts allowing the parents and the for profit doctor the freedom to conduct a cruel expensive medical experiment on the baby is "There's always a chance".
I offered you the medical science that shows there isn't....