I couldn't find the St. Louis Business Journal that first broke the story about Soros backing Ferguson protesters but this should suffice
I read all your links before.
How tenuous is the link that the Washington Times makes
Here's what they wrote...
In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.
The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre.
This is crap.
Soros has been giving money to progressive groups since long before the Trump’s election. In 2017, some of them decided to participate in protests. That doesn't mean that he's responsible for the violent actions. Those who committed violent acts did so of their own volition. What you seem to be saying is that protestors were actually paid to commit violent acts. But there is no evidence offed. Just tenuous linkage. And a head line that isn't supported by the editorial beneath it...
This kind of tenuous linkage and smearing is typical of Brietbart and the Washington Times.. It doesn't begin to rise to any level of credible journalism...
Its "Lets blame the Jew billionare who wants to enslave us..."
Whats wrong with Soros contributing to political causes Dag?
. Soros' choice to put his wealth toward political causes that he believes in is not particularly different from the billions of dollars that right-wing billionaires like Charles and David Koch have been donating to Republican causes for years, said Miami University professor Timothy Melley. The difference is that far more ultra-rich Americans are politically conservative.
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-did- ... ght-2017-5
Where's your evidence that his contributions are specifically intended to pay for violent acts?
My guess is you doubt my claim or think I'm making it up.
I think you must uncritically read bizarre news sources that offer BS journalism like the Washington Times.