Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7388
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 26 Jan 2016, 11:15 am

I am all for publishing grand jury transcripts. I would love to see the transcript on ALL indictments regardless of politics. Here are a few that we could all be more knowledgeable about:

Clinton Email scandal
Flint water scandal
Clinton perjury scandal (Blue dress et. al.)
EPA misconduct with Green River spill
FIFA
VA misconduct
Fast and Furious
Enron

I am sure the list could be even bigger...
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 26 Jan 2016, 11:42 am

freeman3 wrote:In general, it's pretty easy to get an indictment. Care to try and refute that proposition? generally, grand juries are secret so we don't get to see transcripts.


Yes, it is easy to get an indictment. So, did the DA try to indict PP or the CMP? I think it is clear--they wanted CMP. You would not get an indictment otherwise. There's really no such thing as a "rogue grand jury."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the case goes forward, that transcript will be revealed, yes?

As for fun and games comment that is not referring to the videos but the undercover shenanigans that CMS pulled. If they committed a crime in obtaining the videos then they should be punished. Don't you agree? Or should we not publish individuals who commit crimes because they are on our side politically?


Did they do anything a journalist would not do?

Are the CMP folks being charged with conspiracy-like charges? If so, with whom did they conspire?

I think the case against the CMP director will crumble when all the evidence is out.

The Hot Air piece was a smear and was not a legitimate claim of conflict of interest. Period. It was very bad journalism .


I disagree. They presented the evidence mitigating the conflict claim as well. I think it's a LOT more balanced than the NYT piece.

My last paragraph was pure speculation. Withdrawn.


Well played, counselor. Well played.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 26 Jan 2016, 12:09 pm

With regard to the Hot Air piece, I wonder how many prosecutors work for the Harris County DA? Given that they handle the City of Houston, I imagine that there are quite a few prosecutors. At a minimum Hot Air should present that information if they are trying to allege that one prosecutor's views could influence the policies of the office. I know to make such an allegation with regard to the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office would be absolutely ridiculous because it is such a large office. And hey if there are only like three or four prosecutors in the Houston DA's office Hot Air's allegations might be relevant. I am guessing they have a few more prosecutors than that...
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 26 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm

fate
Did they do anything a journalist would not do?


Yes.
And for two of those things, they have been indicted
And for others, they are being sued.
That they have been indicted bodes well for the success of PP's lawsuit.
The lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco against anti-abortion group the Center for Medical Progress alleges conspiracy and fraud among other violations in connection with the recordings.
The videos, which were released in July, sparked widespread controversy by purporting to show Planned Parenthood officials trying to negotiate prices for aborted fetal tissue.
Under federal law, donated human fetal tissue may be used for research, but profiting from its sale is prohibited.
"This case is about a network of anti-abortion extremists and the laws they broke in order to spread lies and harm Planned Parenthood," Dawn Laguens, vice president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said on a conference call.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-p ... M020160114
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 15994
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 27 Jan 2016, 1:58 am

bbauska wrote:I am all for publishing grand jury transcripts. I would love to see the transcript on ALL indictments regardless of politics. Here are a few that we could all be more knowledgeable about:

Clinton Email scandal
Flint water scandal
Clinton perjury scandal (Blue dress et. al.)
EPA misconduct with Green River spill
FIFA
VA misconduct
Fast and Furious
Enron

I am sure the list could be even bigger...
Well, not all of those went to a grand jury. And it can be argued that releasing such details would be prejudicial before a trial (or even after one, or in the absence of one). If charges came direct from the police or prosecutors, rather than a grand jury, what do you think should be released? Too much could compromise that and other investigations.

And against the others, we already know far more than we ever need to about Clinton & Lewinsky.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 27 Jan 2016, 8:20 am

rickyp wrote:fate
Did they do anything a journalist would not do?


Yes.
And for two of those things, they have been indicted


Please demonstrate that no journalist has used these techniques. Thanks.

And for others, they are being sued.
That they have been indicted bodes well for the success of PP's lawsuit.


No, actually, it's no indicator at all. Anytime a grand jury is involved, only one side of a story is presented. I don't know of a lawsuit with similar terms. If you do, please produce the court in which such a thing is possible in the US. Thanks.

The lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco against anti-abortion group the Center for Medical Progress alleges conspiracy and fraud among other violations in connection with the recordings.
The videos, which were released in July, sparked widespread controversy by purporting to show Planned Parenthood officials trying to negotiate prices for aborted fetal tissue.
Under federal law, donated human fetal tissue may be used for research, but profiting from its sale is prohibited.
"This case is about a network of anti-abortion extremists and the laws they broke in order to spread lies and harm Planned Parenthood," Dawn Laguens, vice president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said on a conference call.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-p ... M020160114


They chose the court most likely to be favorable to them. We'll see how they do. My guess: they win, get upheld by the 9th Circuit, and lose at the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision (because 4 justices are legislators and don't give a fig about the law).

Nevertheless, filing a lawsuit is not a "win."

And, on the merits, PP was selling baby parts. If that thrills your soul, well, shame on you.
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7388
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 27 Jan 2016, 9:19 am

danivon wrote:
bbauska wrote:I am all for publishing grand jury transcripts. I would love to see the transcript on ALL indictments regardless of politics. Here are a few that we could all be more knowledgeable about:

Clinton Email scandal
Flint water scandal
Clinton perjury scandal (Blue dress et. al.)
EPA misconduct with Green River spill
FIFA
VA misconduct
Fast and Furious
Enron

I am sure the list could be even bigger...
Well, not all of those went to a grand jury. And it can be argued that releasing such details would be prejudicial before a trial (or even after one, or in the absence of one). If charges came direct from the police or prosecutors, rather than a grand jury, what do you think should be released? Too much could compromise that and other investigations.

And against the others, we already know far more than we ever need to about Clinton & Lewinsky.


Will you feel the same what about other indictments if they come about as you do with the PP indictment? I can only hope you would treat them with the same standard.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 27 Jan 2016, 1:00 pm

Fate
And, on the merits, PP was selling baby parts. If that thrills your soul, well, shame on you
.

You are clinging to an absurd position, as tightly as any conspiracy nut.

The videos show Planned Parenthood doctors discussing the donation of fetal tissue after abortions -- a legal practice. But the CMP edited the videos into episodes that make it look as though Planned Parenthood is selling fetal parts for profit and changing abortion methods to deliver intact specimens. The family planning provider strongly denies both charges, and five separate state investigations into Planned Parenthood have cleared the organization of any wrongdoing.


Here's the independent analysis of the videos... They are fabrications and do not reflect truth. That is called slander and not something journalists do...
And its why they will be sued into financial oblivion. Justly.

http://ppfa.pr-optout.com/ViewAttachmen ... vK5fVC8%3d
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 27 Jan 2016, 2:00 pm

rickyp wrote:Fate
And, on the merits, PP was selling baby parts. If that thrills your soul, well, shame on you
.

You are clinging to an absurd position, as tightly as any conspiracy nut.


Right, so they weren't selling body parts?

Did you watch the videos? (Expected answer: "No, but I've read liberal summaries" or no answer at all)

The videos show Planned Parenthood doctors discussing the donation of fetal tissue after abortions -- a legal practice. But the CMP edited the videos into episodes that make it look as though Planned Parenthood is selling fetal parts for profit and changing abortion methods to deliver intact specimens. The family planning provider strongly denies both charges, and five separate state investigations into Planned Parenthood have cleared the organization of any wrongdoing.


Rubbish. Which states? Don't say Texas. That grand jury didn't "clear" anything.

Here's the independent analysis of the videos... They are fabrications and do not reflect truth. That is called slander and not something journalists do...
And its why they will be sued into financial oblivion. Justly.

http://ppfa.pr-optout.com/ViewAttachmen ... vK5fVC8%3d


Right. Interesting how you decry the power of money until it is used against a group whose only purpose is to support life.

Do you support partial-birth abortion (yes or no)?

Do you support leaving babies who survive abortions without medical care?

That is not "independent" analysis. The only things edited out of the full videos are bathroom breaks and travel times. Planned Parenthood exists primarily to kill babies.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 27 Jan 2016, 3:18 pm

Fate
Which states?


You could actually look it up.
“Over the past week, my office has conducted a thorough review and found that
Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts’ health care centers are fully
compliant with state and federal laws regarding the disposition of fetal tissue,”
Massachusetts’ attorney general said in a statement. “Although donation of fetal
tissue is permissible under state and federal law, PPLM does not have a tissue
donation program. There is no evidence that PPLM is involved in any way in
the buying or selling of tissue. As such, our review is complete” (Boston
Globe. “Planned Parenthood ‘fully compliant’ with law, Healey says” July 29,
2015).
 “The state Health Department says it hasn't received any reports or evidence
that the sale of fetal tissue has occurred in South Dakota since the
department started regulating abortion facilities in 2006” (KLDT News. “Health
Department: No Evidence Of Fetal Tissue Sale In State” August 12, 2015).
 Similarly, in Kansas, an open records’ request from the Associated Press
revealed that an ongoing investigation into Planned Parenthood’s practices is
equally unfounded. There is not, nor has there ever been a tissue donation
program in the state. “A review of the state's records indicate that no fetal
tissue transfer reports have ever been filed with KDHE," Michael Smith, a
department attorney and its open records officer, said in an e-mail. Officials have yet
to announce the end of their investigation, even though there is clearly nothing to
investigate (Star Tribune, “APNewsBreak: Kansas receives no reports on handling
of fetal tissue during past 15 years” August 6, 2015).
Citing no evidence of wrongdoing, eight states have declined to investigate
Planned Parenthood and politicians from across the nation have called the
allegations baseless.
 Officials in Delaware, Idaho, Minnesota, New York, New Hampshire, Virginia,
Washington, and Colorado have declined to investigate Planned Parenthood,
citing no evidence of wrongdoing.
 Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe pushed back against state lawmakers calling
for an investigation, “We in Virginia have no instances, no evidence, no
complaints of any of this.” A spokesman for Governor McAuliffe, said the
video shouldn’t be used as “fodder for political attacks on women’s access
to health care.”
 Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton said: "As far as I'm concerned there's no basis
for an investigation at taxpayer expense into a private nonprofit organization that
has stated they don't engage in those practices here in Minnesota.”
 New Hampshire Governor Maggie Hassan said: "We do not launch
investigations in the state of New Hampshire on rumor. We do not launch
criminal investigations in the state of New Hampshire because somebody
edits a tape."
 New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said: “Planned Parenthood is a critical
healthcare provider for the people of New York, and I will fight for them day in
and day out.Here in New York, we will not defund Planned Parenthood – not now
and not in the future.”
 Washington Governor Jay Inslee said: “Planned Parenthood provides millions of
women across the country access to a full range of affordable health care and
family planning services. National extremist organizations are engaged in a
concerted effort to discredit, and ultimately eliminate, an organization that
so many women rely on. Here in Washington State, where we have long fought
to protect women’s access to family planning services, Planned Parenthood is on
the front lines of women’s health care. I stand with them in their efforts to ensure
every woman needing access to safe and legal reproductive health care can get
it.”
 Idaho Governor Butch Otter declined to investigate Planned Parenthood
citing no evidence of any wrongdoing. “I have been in contact with Planned
Parenthood officials here in Idaho and they assured me that these practices do
not occur in Idaho or within the states that make up Planned Parenthood of the
Great Northwest.”
 The Delaware Division of Public Health issued a letter to legislators stating
simply: “There is no tissue donation program at Planned Parenthood to
investigate.
Politicians have launched investigations into Planned Parenthood in a number of
other states, including Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Ohio, South
Carolina, and Texas – all states where Planned Parenthood does not even
offer fetal tissue donation as an option to patients.


And Texas grand Jury?
Its clear they found nothing at PP.
But found sufficient evidence that CMP should be charged .
hard to paint lipstick on that pig.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 27 Jan 2016, 4:28 pm

rickyp wrote:Fate
Which states?


You could actually look it up.
“Over the past week, my office has conducted a thorough review and found that
Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts’ health care centers are fully
compliant with state and federal laws regarding the disposition of fetal tissue,”
Massachusetts’ attorney general said in a statement. “Although donation of fetal
tissue is permissible under state and federal law, PPLM does not have a tissue
donation program. There is no evidence that PPLM is involved in any way in
the buying or selling of tissue. As such, our review is complete” (Boston
Globe. “Planned Parenthood ‘fully compliant’ with law, Healey says” July 29,
2015).
 “The state Health Department says it hasn't received any reports or evidence
that the sale of fetal tissue has occurred in South Dakota since the
department started regulating abortion facilities in 2006” (KLDT News. “Health
Department: No Evidence Of Fetal Tissue Sale In State” August 12, 2015).
 Similarly, in Kansas, an open records’ request from the Associated Press
revealed that an ongoing investigation into Planned Parenthood’s practices is
equally unfounded. There is not, nor has there ever been a tissue donation
program in the state. “A review of the state's records indicate that no fetal
tissue transfer reports have ever been filed with KDHE," Michael Smith, a
department attorney and its open records officer, said in an e-mail. Officials have yet
to announce the end of their investigation, even though there is clearly nothing to
investigate (Star Tribune, “APNewsBreak: Kansas receives no reports on handling
of fetal tissue during past 15 years” August 6, 2015).
Citing no evidence of wrongdoing, eight states have declined to investigate
Planned Parenthood and politicians from across the nation have called the
allegations baseless.
 Officials in Delaware, Idaho, Minnesota, New York, New Hampshire, Virginia,
Washington, and Colorado have declined to investigate Planned Parenthood,
citing no evidence of wrongdoing.
 Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe pushed back against state lawmakers calling
for an investigation, “We in Virginia have no instances, no evidence, no
complaints of any of this.” A spokesman for Governor McAuliffe, said the
video shouldn’t be used as “fodder for political attacks on women’s access
to health care.”
 Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton said: "As far as I'm concerned there's no basis
for an investigation at taxpayer expense into a private nonprofit organization that
has stated they don't engage in those practices here in Minnesota.”
 New Hampshire Governor Maggie Hassan said: "We do not launch
investigations in the state of New Hampshire on rumor. We do not launch
criminal investigations in the state of New Hampshire because somebody
edits a tape."
 New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said: “Planned Parenthood is a critical
healthcare provider for the people of New York, and I will fight for them day in
and day out.Here in New York, we will not defund Planned Parenthood – not now
and not in the future.”
 Washington Governor Jay Inslee said: “Planned Parenthood provides millions of
women across the country access to a full range of affordable health care and
family planning services. National extremist organizations are engaged in a
concerted effort to discredit, and ultimately eliminate, an organization that
so many women rely on. Here in Washington State, where we have long fought
to protect women’s access to family planning services, Planned Parenthood is on
the front lines of women’s health care. I stand with them in their efforts to ensure
every woman needing access to safe and legal reproductive health care can get
it.”
 Idaho Governor Butch Otter declined to investigate Planned Parenthood
citing no evidence of any wrongdoing. “I have been in contact with Planned
Parenthood officials here in Idaho and they assured me that these practices do
not occur in Idaho or within the states that make up Planned Parenthood of the
Great Northwest.”
 The Delaware Division of Public Health issued a letter to legislators stating
simply: “There is no tissue donation program at Planned Parenthood to
investigate.
Politicians have launched investigations into Planned Parenthood in a number of
other states, including Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Ohio, South
Carolina, and Texas – all states where Planned Parenthood does not even
offer fetal tissue donation as an option to patients.


And Texas grand Jury?
Its clear they found nothing at PP.
But found sufficient evidence that CMP should be charged .
hard to paint lipstick on that pig.


Were there any Republicans in your list? I know Otter is. I hope he's enjoyed being governor because he won't get reelected.

As for Texas, we only know what a grand jury did. The grand jury can only follow the DA's lead--that's how that works. It only means the DA didn't care about PP.

As freeman3 said, a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich. If they didn't, it's because the DA didn't want PP indicted.

Interesting: the CMP folks were indicted for attempting to buy body parts. Of course, you can't do that if:

1. There is no seller.
2. There are no "parts."

Think about that.

Questions you didn't answer:

Was PP selling body parts? (If not, how can they harvest specific organs and get cash for them? Why do they care about techniques? Is it legal to change techniques in order to get specific parts?)

Did you watch the videos?

Do you support partial-birth abortion (yes or no)?

Do you support leaving babies who survive abortions without medical care?
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 15994
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 6:29 am

Post 28 Jan 2016, 1:15 am

bbauska wrote:Will you feel the same what about other indictments if they come about as you do with the PP indictment? I can only hope you would treat them with the same standard.

Sure.

But it has been six months and several State probes already and nothing, so I won't hold my breath.
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 11324
Joined: 15 Aug 2000, 8:59 am

Post 28 Jan 2016, 7:12 am

fate
Interesting: the CMP folks were indicted for attempting to buy body parts. Of course, you can't do that if:

1. There is no seller.
2. There are no "parts."

Think about that


I did. Did you?
Its the same as attempting to bribe a public official who will not be bribed, or buy drugs from an undercover agent who has no drugs to sell.
That the criminals are dumb enough to try doing something illegal is enough to get them charged with "attempt".

Fate
Questions you didn't answer:

The long list of investigations that were ended for lack of evidence provides answers your questions. I didn't bother to look up all of them but Idaho is Republican isn't it?
But what does that matter?

The PP was not selling body parts. The videos you are referring to are fabrications. Partial birth abortion is both illegal and before made illegal was only 0.17% of abortions. Very, very rare.
There is no such thing as baby surviving an abortion.
In responses from 38 attorneys general to date, not one AG office provided evidence that it has ever had cause to prosecute a physician for delivering and then killing a viable fetus, indicating that this notion—that there are multiple cases of fetuses surviving an abortion, only to be killed by a doctor—is a confection of the anti-choice camp, designed to replace fact-based arguments with the lowest form of fear-mongering.

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/ ... abortions/

For the record, Fate, I believe in the right of women, in consultation with their doctor, to choose abortion before the 22nd week or so... I would prefer that women had access to freely available birth control, and that all young people had comprehensive educations about sexuality before they became sexual active ...
Where this happens, recourse to abortion is much lower. I don't think you can ever get to where abortion can be eliminated though that would be preferable.
Please remember that the real reason abortion is legal, in the US and everywhere else, is because even though illegal women sought and got abortions anyway, and about the same rate as when it is legal. But many women died or were harmed because the procedures were not safe. Try looking at newspaper reports of women protesting for safe abortion access in the early sixties.. This was a hard won right.

Making abortion illegal doesn't end abortions, it only endangers women. In order to limit abortions, effective prevention is the best option.
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 21062
Joined: 15 Jun 2002, 6:53 am

Post 28 Jan 2016, 11:39 am

rickyp wrote:The PP was not selling body parts. The videos you are referring to are fabrications.


Hands over eyes. Hands over ears. Well done.

Partial birth abortion is both illegal and before made illegal was only 0.17% of abortions. Very, very rare.


Right, but the question was dodged. Do you support the procedure?

There is no such thing as baby surviving an abortion.


Really? Want to bet? Name your price.

In responses from 38 attorneys general to date, not one AG office provided evidence that it has ever had cause to prosecute a physician for delivering and then killing a viable fetus, indicating that this notion—that there are multiple cases of fetuses surviving an abortion, only to be killed by a doctor—is a confection of the anti-choice camp, designed to replace fact-based arguments with the lowest form of fear-mongering.

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/ ... abortions/


You should change your screen name to "easily duped." That website is for "Reproductive & Sexual Health and Justice," but you couldn't even bother to think for a moment that it might be skewed? Did they way they framed the issue not clue you in? ". . . prosecut(ing) a physician for delivering and then killing a viable fetus . . ." is not what I asked. Even so, in the paragraph above the one you cited, we find this:

The answers provided by states show that Gosnell was, in fact, a rogue provider, and that there is no evidence of a pattern of infants being “born alive” after an abortion, much less of doctors killing infants in those circumstances. (Pennsylvania’s attorney general told RH Reality Check that it did not have a copy of what it had sent to the House Judiciary Committee, or whether it had in fact replied to the committee’s inquiry.)


Why was that? Because Gosnell DID kill babies who survived abortions. But, there are more who survive them.

Babies sometimes do survive abortions:

The federal government confirms a large number of babies survive failed abortions. In 2011, the CDC recorded 1,298 cases of infant death in the U.S. due to “Other perinatal conditions,” which includes ICD-10 category P96.4, death subsequent to a failed “termination of pregnancy.”


Here are stories from survivors: http://www.teenbreaks.com/abortion/abor ... vivors.cfm

Here are nurses who have witnessed it: http://liveactionnews.org/report-tells- ... abortions/

For the record, Fate, I believe in the right of women, in consultation with their doctor, to choose abortion before the 22nd week or so... I would prefer that women had access to freely available birth control, and that all young people had comprehensive educations about sexuality before they became sexual active ...


After one abortion, what would you think? They already know what causes pregnancy and how to avoid it, which, even in the US, costs pennies per day.

(Abortion) was a hard won right.


Not really. It was "sued" into existence.

Making abortion illegal doesn't end abortions, it only endangers women. In order to limit abortions, effective prevention is the best option.


Odd, I didn't call for making it illegal.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 28 Jan 2016, 12:15 pm

Thanks Ricky for the link to an analysis of the videos. Very convincing evidence the videos were manipulated. CMS should have kept unaltered videos to show that the edited videos were only edited to remove non-relevant content and not to manipulate content. As Fusion GPS says these videos "have no evidentiary value in a legal context".