Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 14 Feb 2020, 8:44 am

Stop and frisk was based on what they call a Terry Stop, which allows a police officer to briefly detain someone if they have reasonable suspicion that they committee a crime. The Wikipedia article presented figures that 90% of those stopped were Latino or African-American (as opposed to their overall percentage of the population being 54%), primarily being the ages of 14-24; 70% were later determined to be innocent; at the height of the program almost 700,00 stops (for comparison there are about 10,000 now) were made with 88% not resulting in a fine or conviction.

Yes, safety is important but the police have to operate in a race-neutral fashion. And going into poor neighborhoods with high rates of crime and stopping large numbers of young Latino and Black men based on vague suspicions of their being involved in a crime is not an acceptable policy. There is aggressive policing...and then there is unconstitutional policing. When almost 9 out of ten those stopped you don't bother charging, that indicates that stops are being made without sufficient justification.

And was the policy really to protect people in those communities or was it rather to prevent them from coming into wealthier areas and committing crimes? Maybe the policy helped to reduce crime, I don't know, but even if it did it ignores constant police intrusion among many Blacks and Latinos who have done nothing wrong. This kind of focus on minorities with regard to policing is certainly not limited to New York, as particularly young black men across the country have historically received differential attention from police even if they are law-abiding citizens.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 14 Feb 2020, 9:04 am

Stop and frisk started to decline after 2012 (532,911 in 2012, 191,851 in 2013, 45,787 in 2014 etc). Violent crime rates continued to drop after that (though it looks like there was an uptick in 2019 in murder numbers according to the NY Times)

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/nycrime.htm
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: 02 Oct 2000, 9:01 am

Post 14 Feb 2020, 4:01 pm

Ray Jay wrote:
freeman3 wrote:I already did not like Bloomberg trying to buy the Democratic nomination. But that 2015 video where he justifies stop and frisk and the consequences for minorities with such casual disregard for the effects of that policy on minorities, indicates a level of bias/prejudice against minorities that should disqualify him from the nomination.


I agree that Bloomberg's remarks are insensitive, but from a policy perspective I tend to believe that stop and frisk does more good than harm. If you were to poll people who live in poor urban areas in the US, I wonder whether they generally support the police taking a hard line for the sake of their safety. I don't know … I just wonder. Prejudice is bad, but safety is priceless.


I can say emphatically that 100% of the people I know who were stopped and frisked during this time hated it, and hate his guts. In one case it happened with one guy who had his little girl with him. Granted, I'm talking 3 people, but it was generally bad for the people who were targeted, and I'm sure 90+% of those folks will tell you that it was BS. You might find some older women of color who weren't targeted who might agree with you, though.

It was wrong, but I'd still vote for him if he got nominated. If you're drowning, you don't really care how nice your life-raft is, you want a life raft.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 14 Feb 2020, 7:37 pm

I would vote for him too in that scenario. But that is an extremely low standard in my view and I prefer someone else. I think the more important question would be whether you prefer he is the nominee--even with his warts-- because of the view that he has the best chance of beating Trump. He is sort of immune from a lot of the attacks that Trump would make against other Democratic candidates. I am just surprised that a smart guy would say such things (he also said some controversial things about the cause of the Financial Crisis).
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: 02 Oct 2000, 9:01 am

Post 13 Apr 2020, 1:22 pm

I hate the fact that the nomination ended in such a whimper. I really hate that Pete and Amy dropped out prior to Super Tuesday, when there was absolutely no reason to, other than they got pressure from the party. I really, really hate the fact that Joe Biden was the best the Dems thought they could bring against Trump. Is anyone else shaking their head? How did we get here?
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 13 Apr 2020, 4:03 pm

I totally agree. I feel these are the worst two candidates to ever run against each other for president . By a wide margin. I complained bitterly about the Democratic Party orchestrating the result. I have to think that younger Democratic voters have to be totally turned off by the process. How did such completely incompetent people (for the presidency) get in such a position? I feel like I would be happier choosing the president by random from the members of our RBL league...
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7042
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 13 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm

freeman3 wrote:I totally agree. I feel these are the worst two candidates to ever run against each other for president . By a wide margin. I complained bitterly about the Democratic Party orchestrating the result. I have to think that younger Democratic voters have to be totally turned off by the process. How did such completely incompetent people (for the presidency) get in such a position? I feel like I would be happier choosing the president by random from the members of our RBL league...


You mean I have a chance?
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 13 Apr 2020, 7:15 pm

Of course!
User avatar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 4888
Joined: 08 Jun 2000, 10:26 am

Post 14 Apr 2020, 8:12 am

A fun game is to write a one sentence endorsement of Biden without using "Trump" or "Obama".

Mine: Biden, he's still not comatose.
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: 02 Oct 2000, 9:01 am

Post 14 Apr 2020, 9:02 am

OK, I'll play, but this is probably the best reason to vote for him, for real:

"Biden: He'll pick really good officials and advisors, and he'll listen to them."
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: 02 Oct 2000, 9:01 am

Post 14 Apr 2020, 9:03 am

I still don't know how we got here. So disappointing.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 14 Apr 2020, 9:59 am

Vote For Joe! He's so-so....
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7042
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 14 Apr 2020, 10:40 am

Biden: You wanted ANYONE else...

Side note: This is how I felt about Trump. Exactly why I voted for Evan McMullin. I urge all people of conscience to do the same as I did. If Biden is not you man, vote 3rd party.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: 17 May 2013, 3:32 pm

Post 14 Apr 2020, 1:57 pm

Well, it's like choosing between raw broccoli or carrots, Brad: chocolate cake is not on the menu (ballot)
User avatar
Administrator
 
Posts: 7042
Joined: 26 Jun 2000, 1:13 pm

Post 14 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm

I felt the same way with a Clinton/Trump choice.

I voted conscience in the same situation. I urge others to do the same. Why do you think this is different?