Join In On The Action "Register Here" To View The Forums

Already a Member Login Here

Board index Forum Index
User avatar
Rally Racer (Pro III)
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am

Post 14 Jan 2011, 10:31 am

Initially posted at old site in December:

Before I forget, some thoughts on the league.

1) FAAB system. One year trial is complete and we will default to the old system unless a new amendment is passed.

2) IR. I wouldn't mind seeing one IR position. It gives you a place to put an injured keeper without burning an active spot.

Any other big (or small) issues out there?
User avatar
Statesman
 
Posts: 708
Joined: 17 Oct 2000, 12:18 pm

Post 16 Jan 2011, 7:25 pm

1) I am for the for the FAAB system because it is different. I think it hurts more keen managers, which is me, but whatever. Still fun.
2) We already have 14 teams (which is great) and 16 roster spots which leaves not a lot of players. I think it is hard enough to improve your team if you start out poorly so I think I would vote no on that one.
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 967
Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am

Post 17 Jan 2011, 11:13 pm

I liked FAAB. Wouldn't mind seeing it in the RBL, though I also think the system there works well enough.

I think the benches are deep enough to support injured players as is.
User avatar
Rally Racer (Pro III)
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am

Post 30 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm

Bump.

Time to start seriously thinking about changes you would like to see in the league.
User avatar
Rally Racer (Pro III)
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am

Post 27 May 2011, 12:25 pm

Something we did in the RBL that's worth consideration here (if we go back to the old waiver system):

-Players acquired via waiver maintain their base values.
-FA's always reset to zero (including original owners).
-Limited & keeper restricted acquisitions during playoffs.
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 967
Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am

Post 28 May 2011, 1:06 pm

I still say keep FAAB. I know Barry's against it and Greg's for it, but beyond that I don't know where league sentiment is.
User avatar
Rally Racer (Pro III)
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am

Post 01 Jun 2011, 7:32 am

Looking for an owner to replace Pete. Redscape member preferred - I've advertised in the general forums - but can go outside if needed. As soon as we have a full ownership, I'll send out the amendments for voting.

Note - Tony's not confirmed but 99% positive he's in. I'll see him this weekend.
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 967
Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am

Post 01 Jun 2011, 1:35 pm

I'll put in my official vote for FAAB here. I think it's both significantly more fair and far more strategically interesting than waivers.
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 01 Jun 2011, 10:39 pm

Post 01 Jun 2011, 10:41 pm

I think we should vote on the IR amendment as well. I think it should be a true IR slot though. Once a guy goes in, he stays until next season or you cut him.
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 967
Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am

Post 02 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm

z06man wrote:I think we should vote on the IR amendment as well. I think it should be a true IR slot though. Once a guy goes in, he stays until next season or you cut him.


I'd be more favorably inclined toward this then a baseball DL-style IR spot.
User avatar
Rally Racer (Pro III)
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am

Post 02 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm

I like the idea of limiting the IR slot to a single use (no changing your mind once you've used it). Should the amendment only allow for one such slot?
User avatar
Adjutant
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 01 Jun 2011, 10:39 pm

Post 03 Jun 2011, 12:48 am

I think if you are willing to drop the player in IR, you should be able to reuse it.
User avatar
Rally Racer (Pro III)
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am

Post 03 Jun 2011, 6:14 am

Maybe I'm confused on what you mean. Could you write down what the rule would look like - that might clarify it in my mind.
User avatar
Dignitary
 
Posts: 967
Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 5:17 am

Post 03 Jun 2011, 6:34 pm

The idea is that you cannot move a player who is on IR back onto your active roster, he must either remain on the IR or be released.
User avatar
Rally Racer (Pro III)
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: 08 Apr 2002, 9:45 am

Post 03 Jun 2011, 6:51 pm

Got it.